
PHAEDEAUX, LLC
Performance Report |
Below you'll find your current Performance
Report, a tool used by clients to rate your performance on
consulting projects. Clients may view this report at any time
throughout their selection process. Each time you complete a project
through eWork Markets this data will be
updated to reflect your new evaluations. Please note: all scores
have been scrambled to keep your clients' comments confidential.
Also, average scores reflect all of your completed appraisals,
including ones that are not visible on this page.
|
![]()
|
Principal Services: Business Planning
•Market Research •New Business Development•New Product Launch•Public Relations•Media•Direct Response Marketing
•P&L Management•Business-to-Business
Marketing |

|
Comprehensive Performance Ratings: |

|
|
|
The comprehensive score below includes the
total number of reviews received for this firm. Note: Some
previous clients may not have provided ratings in all
performance areas. |
|
Below Expectations |
Met Expectations |
Exceeded Expectations |
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
| |
|
Criteria |
Average
Rating |
|
|
|
Overall
Satisfaction
How satisfied
the client was overall with the services they received. |
![]()
|
5.0 |

|
|
|

|
|
Proficiency
How
proficient the client believes PHAEDEAUX, LLC was,
within the scope of the services delivered. |

|
5.0 |

|
|
|

|
|
Responsiveness
How
responsive PHAEDEAUX, LLC was in meeting the client's
needs and desires. |

|
4.7 |

|
|
|

|
|
Results
How
close the results of the project came to the expectation set
by PHAEDEAUX, LLC. |

|
4.7 |

|
|
|

|
|
Cost
Performance
How well PHAEDEAUX, LLC did in meeting projected costs, taking
into account reasonable cost increases caused by unforeseen
circumstances. |

|
5.0 |

|
|
|

|
|
Schedule
Performance
How well PHAEDEAUX, LLC did in meeting projected schedules,
taking into account reasonable extensions caused by unforeseen
circumstances. |

|
4.3 |

|
|
|
|
|
|
Client
Profiles |
Client
Industry: |
Financial
Services |

|
Project
Duration: |
23
Months |
Start
Date: |
09/2003 |

|
Services
Delivered: |
Lead followup, sales conversions,
business plan / private placment memorandum, billings,
payment processing, customer service, business
consulting, system uploads, referrals, cross-selling. |
|
|

|
|

Client
Industry: |
Housing
& Real Estate |

|
Project
Duration: |
15
Months |
Start
Date: |
05/2004 |

|
Services
Delivered: |
Marketing
Services |
|
|
|
Client
Industry: |
Nonprofits |

|
Project
Duration: |
29
Months |
Start
Date: |
03/2003 |

|
Services
Delivered: |
Press
release distribution, business plan development,
reviews, interviews |
|
|

|
|


|

|

|
These scores are
randomly displayed and do not correspond to the Client
Profiles section above. The most recent scores include the
ratings from the most recent clients. |

|

|

|
|

|
 |

|
Client
1 |
Client
2 |
Client
3 |

|
Overall
Satisfaction: |
5.0 |
5.0 |
5.0 |
|

|
Cost: |
5.0 |
5.0 |
5.0 |
|

|
Schedule: |
3.0 |
5.0 |
5.0 |
|

|
Responsiveness: |
4.0 |
5.0 |
5.0 |
|

|
Proficiency: |
5.0 |
5.0 |
5.0 |
|

|
Results: |
4.0 |
5.0 |
5.0 |
|
|

|

Comprehensive Performance
Ratings:
|

|

|

|
Client
1: |
Kim Sanders is
an excellent marketer, with great insight into marketing
strategy and development of business initiatives. Would highly
recommend her services. |

|

|
Client
2: |
I would use
Phaedeaux LLC again in a heartbeat
-- as a matter of fact, I will be doing so again in the near
future. I would recommend them to anyone considering their
services. |

|

|
Client
3: |
I have been
working with Kim for years and she has never dissappointed me. The quality of her work
always exceeds my expectations. If you have an opportunity to
work with her do not pass it up. |

|

|
|

This report is
provided solely for use by the purchaser as one factor in the
purchaser's contracting, hiring or other business decisions. It is
compiled from sources that eWork Markets
does not control. In providing this report, eWork Markets does not assume any part of the
user's business risk and shall not be liable for any loss or injury
resulting from reliance on this report. This report may not be
reproduced in whole or part in any manner whatsoever.
|